![]() |
Town
of Lamoine, Maine |
||||||
The Official Website of Lamoine's Town Government |
|||||||
Minutes - October 5, 2020 (Draft, subject to correction) |
Board Members Present: John Holt, Chris Tadema-Wielandt,
Perry Fowler, Richard McMullen, Stewart Workman, Steve Gabel-Richards
Members of the Public Present: None
CEO: Rebecca Albright
Call to Order: 6:59 PM
Consideration of Minutes:
Motion to accept minutes from August 31,
(Fowler/McMullen). Passed 5 - 0
Code Enforcement
Officer’s Reports
Permits issued - reviewed and no discussion.
Enforcement Activities - ongoing with no
changes
Review of
Permit Conditions
tracking Report
- Restoration work at the Asher Pit, which was to be completed by 9/30/20
has been done and seems to be taking. Ceo will revisit and confirm this.
Old Business:
1.
There will be a joint
meeting of Selectmen, Planning Board and Board of Assessors, requested by the
assessors, to begin a discussion to develop procedures for reporting violations
that assessors may find while carrying out their duties.
2.
Shoreland Zoning Map to
be printed by College of the Atlantic when they open up.
3.
Chair Holt has
contacted Stu, Griff Fenton, and the town lawyer for clarification of the
process that is to be followed following the State Supreme Court decision on the
Kittredge Pit expansion. This is necessary as the Board and CEO look at possible
violations in the original pit area.
4.
Tadema-Wielandt brought
up the missing sign at the entrance to the Asher Pit. CEO will contact Steve
Salsbury, agent for Harold MacQuinn, and remind him that a sign is required by
the ordinance.
New Business: None
Ordinance Development: Chair Holt brought up
several ordinance issues that were in need of clarification. This was just at
the discussion level and if the Board feels that we should address these they
will be placed on a future agenda.
1.
In the BLUO, the
section on nonconforming structures. The Board felt that this section could use
more direction and guidance to property owners.
2.
BLUO Section 12 - deals
with front yard setback of 75 feet from the centerline of a Public Road.
Discussion followed about what constitutes a public road. An amendment was
suggested that would remove “public” from the road description and instead the
setback would be from the centerline of the roads within the subdivision.
3.
Site Plan Review
Ordinance, Section M, Appeals. The Board discussed reorganizing this section to
clarify what type of appeal is permitted and to which body it can be made.
4.
Site Plan Review
Ordinance, Section J, General Review Standards, 1. Preserve and Enhance the
Landscape. There are two paragraphs in the section dealing with preserving and
enhancing the landscape and it was suggested that these should be designated
paragraph “a” and paragraph “b”.
5.
Building Height. The
three major ordinances each contain different definitions of building height and
how it is determined. After a lengthy discussion, the Board will take up
possible new language at a future meeting.
Upcoming Meeting Dates:
Regular meetings: November 9, December 7,
January 4.
Meeting Adjourned: 8:34 PM